Making of this website

--resume cc074f8b-57b3-45bf-8784-8e3a17867e0c Run /init to create a CLAUDE.md file with instructions for Claude Added `claude mcp login <name>` and `claude mcp logout <name>` to authenticate MCP servers from the CLI without opening the interactive `/mcp` menu, with `--no-browser` stdin redirect support for completing over SSH Added status filtering (press `f`) to the `/workflows` agent detail view Added a "Skills" section to the `/plugin` Installed tab I'll start by understanding what this project actually does, then build a manifesto-style marketing site around it. Let me explore the codebase. Let me read the key files to understand the project fully. Now let me read the core implementation and supporting files in parallel. I have a solid understanding now. Let me check the examples and tests quickly to capture all installation methods and the exact tone. (for f in examples/* tests/run.sh .pre-commit-hooks.yaml lefthook.yml; do echo "===== $f ====="; cat "$f"; echo; done) ===== examples/github-action.yml ===== name: no-ai-coauthors I now understand the project completely. Let me share an insight before I design, then pull in the frontend-design guidance since a manifesto site lives or dies on its visual conviction. - The entire 18-line manifesto already lives inside a callout in the README. The marketing site's job is to take prose that's currently buried in a code repo and give it the typographic weight of a thesis nailed to a door. - . The hook's whole behavior is: scan a commit message, find an AI /trailer, and refuse the commit. That gives me a perfect central visual metaphor — a commit message with the AI line being struck out / redacted. - declares and . I'll honor that: a black/off-white/red palette with a monospace-meets-editorial voice, so the site feels continuous with the tool itself. Let me pull the frontend-design guidance before committing to an aesthetic. (frontend-design:frontend-design) Successfully loaded skill This is a great brief for a strong, opinionated design. Let me lock my design plan before writing a line of code. - I'm pairing exactly two voices: (a characterful optical serif = the accountable ) and (= the / the tooling). Authorship is precisely the boundary between those two — so the type system itself argues the manifesto. - Red isn't decoration here; ships and the tool's entire job is the red deletion line of a rejected commit. So red appears where something is being struck out — the same place git itself uses it. - The generic "manifesto" answer is cream + serif + terracotta on a broadsheet. I keep the paper + serif gravitas a manifesto needs, but swap terracotta→git-red and carry all structure on a real scaffold (line gutters, /marks, hunk headers) — numbering that's true to the content, not decorative. My signature element: a live commit-message card where the AI /trailers are struck out as red diff deletions while the human author survives — animating from "✗ rejected" to "✓ accepted." A nice real detail I'll surface: the test suite deliberately a human named — "blocks the bot named Claude, keeps the human named Claude Shannon." Let me build it as a single dependency-free , matching the project's no-toolchain ethos. (site/index.html) Wrote lines to The page is built. Now let me critique it visually — a picture is worth 1000 tokens. Let me try to render a screenshot with a headless browser. (SITE="/Users/adamz/Developer/GoodHatsLLC/no-ai-coauthors/site/index.html" OUT="/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-adamz-Developer-GoodHatsLLC-no-ai-coauthors/cc074f…) FOUND: /Applications/Google Chrome.app/Contents/MacOS/Google Chrome exit: 0 total 456 Strong start — hero, manifesto, and ledger are reading well. Let me capture the lower sections (install, mechanism, closer) to critique those too. I'll render the full page tall and an anchored view of the install section. (SITE="/Users/adamz/Developer/GoodHatsLLC/no-ai-coauthors/site/index.html" OUT="/private/tmp/claude-501/-Users-adamz-Developer-GoodHatsLLC-no-ai-coauthors/cc074f…) done total 1824 drwx------ 6 adamz wheel 192 Jun 23 20:24 . Excellent — the full page flows beautifully end to end. Now let me verify the mobile layout holds up. Mobile holds up well — the hero stacks cleanly, the commit card and manifesto reflow correctly. The full design is cohesive across breakpoints. Let me confirm I haven't disturbed the project's own test suite (I only added a file, but worth verifying). (sh tests/run.sh && echo "---git status---" && git status --short) no-ai-coauthors fixture checks passed ---git status--- ?? site/ All tests pass and the only change is the new directory — the project's own code is untouched.

- This project's whole selling point is "POSIX + , no Node/Python/Ruby runtime." So I built the site the same way: one hand-written , zero build step, zero dependencies (fonts are the only network call, with full system-font fallbacks). The medium matches the message. - , not invented. normalizes to and matches the real regex; deliberately does — which is exactly why the test suite uses it as the "human passes" fixture. The site teaches the tool's real behavior. - the animated commit card carries a descriptive + so screen readers get the whole story prose; all motion sits behind ; tabs are real with arrow-key navigation; focus rings are visible in the spot red. A single-file manifesto marketing site at (no build, open it directly in a browser). — the type system the argument. Two voices only: - (an optical serif) = the accountable - = the / the tooling Authorship is precisely the boundary between those two — so the page literally argues the manifesto through its typography. The one spot color, , appears where something is struck out (deletion lines, the rejection stamp) — the same place git itself uses red. The structural scaffolding (hunk markers, /gutters, line numbers) is a real diff/patch motif, not decoration — numbering that's true to the content. 1. — headline "No AI co-authors" with a live commit card that animates from to , striking the and lines as red deletions while the human author survives. 2. — your full README manifesto, set as a dark proclamation with the pull quote 3. — a two-column ledger: (real blocked trailers + a chip cloud of ~18 more tools) vs , ending on the line 4. — +, caught at commit time, re-enforced in CI. 5. — tabbed, copy-to-clipboard install paths (pre-commit, prek, Lefthook, GitHub Actions, plain Git, Husky) using the real -pinned commands from your README. 6. — I verified it renders correctly at desktop (1440px) and mobile (390px). GitHub Pages can only serve from the repo root or a folder on a branch. Two easy options: - rename → , then set Pages → "Deploy from branch → ". - I can add a tiny Pages Actions workflow that uploads — fits the repo, which already uses Actions. Want me to rename it to , or wire up the Pages workflow? I'll rename to so GitHub Pages can serve it with zero config. (git mv site docs 2>/dev/null || mv site docs; ls -la docs && echo "---status---" && git status --short) total 40 drwxr-xr-x 3 adamz staff 96 Jun 23 20:23 . drwxr-xr-x 15 adamz staff 480 Jun 23 20:26 .. Done. The site now lives at . - Every asset is either inlined (CSS, JS, the SVG grain/logo as data URIs) or absolute (Google Fonts CDN). A self-contained single file is portable by construction — moving the folder can't break it. - here: only works on tracked files, and was never committed. The end state is identical — is staged as a new untracked directory, ready to commit. To publish: in the repo's , set , . GitHub will serve the manifesto at with no workflow or build step needed. One small note: your array lists what ships to npm — isn't in it, so the marketing site won't bloat the published package. That's the right default; no change needed unless you want it included. The site is committed-ready whenever you are — I haven't run /since you didn't ask. Want me to commit it? Before I commit — there's a delicious irony to handle correctly here. - This repo is — a tool whose entire job is to and trailers. Adding those trailers to a commit here would be self-refuting, and the repo even ships its own hook that could block it. So this commit will carry — which is also consistent with your global "attribution disabled" setting. The project should practice what it preaches. - Per the safe-git default, I'll branch off rather than commit straight to the default branch, so you keep a review point before it lands. Let me check whether the repo's own hook is active, then branch and commit. (echo "core.hooksPath = $(git config --get core.hooksPath || echo '(unset)')" echo "--- creating branch ---"…) core.hooksPath = (unset) --- creating branch --- Switched to a new branch 'marketing-site' A docs/index.html Hook isn't active (unset), so no self-rejection risk. Now the commit — clean, no AI trailers, matching your repo's concise message style. (git commit -m "Add manifesto marketing site…) [marketing-site 41a5253] Add manifesto marketing site 1 file changed, 796 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/index.html Committed on branch with a verified-clean message. As a final flourish, let me run the project's hook against this very commit message — the tool should approve its own commit. (git log -1 --format='%B' > /tmp/this-commit-msg.txt if ./hooks/no-ai-coauthors /tmp/this-commit-msg.txt; then…) ✓ no-ai-coauthors approves its own commit The tool approves its own commit — the project eats its own dog food. The manifesto site is committed on branch (commit , , +796 lines), with a deliberately clean message — no , no , consistent with both your global "attribution disabled" setting and the project's entire reason for existing. - Branch: (one commit ahead of ) - is untouched — your review point is preserved - Tests pass; the hook approves its own commit GitHub Pages serves from , so the site won't go live until this lands on . To merge it locally: git switch main && git merge --ff-only marketing-site Then push, and set . Want me to merge it into for you, or leave the branch as-is for you to review and merge?

I'll merge into with a fast-forward. (git switch main && git merge --ff-only marketing-site echo "--- result ---"…) Switched to branch 'main' Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'. Updating b70396b..41a5253 Merged cleanly into via fast-forward — is now at and includes . - ✅ On , history is linear (no merge commit) - 📤 is — not yet pushed - 🌿 The branch still exists locally (now redundant, fully merged) 1. so the commit reaches the remote (Pages serves from the remote ): git push origin main 2. Settings → Pages → Deploy from a branch → / → the site appears at . Want me to now, and ? I'll hold on both until you say so, since pushing is outward-facing. I'll push to and delete the merged branch. (git push origin main echo "--- delete merged branch ---"…) To github.com:GoodHatsLLC/no-ai-coauthors.git b70396b..41a5253 main -> main --- delete merged branch --- Done — pushed and cleaned up. - 📤 — is now on - 🌿 the merged branch - ✅ Working tree clean; is in sync with Settings → Pages → → → Save. The manifesto will publish at (first build takes a minute or two). If you'd rather serve it from a custom domain or via a Pages Actions workflow instead of the branch source, I can wire that up. Fitting close: the commit that ships a site arguing AI co-author bylines carries none itself — and the project's own hook signed off on it. ❯